Steroid Cycle No Results

Content:
  • Anders Nedergaard
  • 2 weeks on Tren Ace + Test E and no results
  • Will I Lose All Gains After One Cycle?

    Anders Nedergaard

    steroid cycle no results This is one of the biggest lies surrounding the use of anabolic steroids. Because they work and do so very, very well. And even though roids most likely sterooid increase the adaptive response to training, they also grow muscle all by themselves. But this fact, that steroids grow muscle even in the absence of training, is a fact that most juicers steroids for ripped muscles a VERY hard time dealing with. The reason behind this was of course that no-one had done studies resuots supraphysiological doses of anabolic steroids yet and in the light of this absence, there was actually no real evidence to resulhs the notion that steroid cycle no results steroids were the game changers that some people claimed even back then — usually the ones who were in lifting circles and had witnessed it first hand. But dianabol 10 mg fiyat and behold, in Shalender Bhasin had a paper published in one of the most prestigious medical journals, the Eteroid England Journal of Medicine, describing a study that would forever change the view on anabolic steroids Bhasin et al, Essentially steroid cycle no results study was a double cross-over study in which 43 young healthy normal weight men, were put on standardized diets and then into one of four intervention steroid cycle no results.

    2 weeks on Tren Ace + Test E and no results

    steroid cycle no results

    This is one of the biggest lies surrounding the use of anabolic steroids. Because they work and do so very, very well. And even though roids most likely do increase the adaptive response to training, they also grow muscle all by themselves. But this fact, that steroids grow muscle even in the absence of training, is a fact that most juicers have a VERY hard time dealing with.

    The reason behind this was of course that no-one had done studies with supraphysiological doses of anabolic steroids yet and in the light of this absence, there was actually no real evidence to support the notion that anabolic steroids were the game changers that some people claimed even back then — usually the ones who were in lifting circles and had witnessed it first hand. But lo and behold, in Shalender Bhasin had a paper published in one of the most prestigious medical journals, the New England Journal of Medicine, describing a study that would forever change the view on anabolic steroids Bhasin et al, Essentially the study was a double cross-over study in which 43 young healthy normal weight men, were put on standardized diets and then into one of four intervention groups:.

    For reference, the recommended prescribed dose of testosterone for replacement therapy is mg every 2 to three weeks. Naturally, these guys grew muscle and got leaner, but how much?

    Bhasin reported that the changes in fat-free mass were as follows, per group:. Thereby proving beyond any reasonable doubt that mgs of Testosterone Enanthate per week does indeed cause skeletal muscle hypertrophy and increases in strength strength data not shown in this blog post.

    But besides showing that testosterone actually works, it also shows that testosterone causes skeletal muscle hypertrophy and strength improvements even in the absence of training! Also, no exercise and testosterone actually worked better than the exercise by itself…. Note that in this study, no one did any exercise.

    Again, consider that the normal dosage used for replacement therapy in hypogonadism is mg of Test E every two to three weeks more frequently 3 than two , i. That is again, without any exercise!! Now, testosterone grows muscle even in the absence of training, but there are some interesting addendums. First, please note that the graph for changes in muscle mass by no means seems to indicate any degree of saturation.

    This indicates that much larger doses would be even more effective. Also, note that the amount of muscle grown with the same dosages in 10 weeks was about 3 kgs. So if we subtract the first 3 weeks from each study and compare 3 kgs in 7 weeks vs. In a later study, in which they used the same protocol, they demonstrated essentially the same results, but in a larger cohort and that conversion to dihydrotestosterone is not neccessary for testosterone to work Bhasin et al, Anabolic steroids grow muscle all on their own.

    To put the numbers into context, a normal adult man of 80 kgs will have about kgs of muscle mass and kgs of fat mass. Going from 27 kgs of muscle and 12 kgs of fat to 35 kgs of muscle and 10 kgs of fat would be, ahem, a quite visible change. Those are approximately the changes that would be expected with 12 months of really serious resistance training and decent nutrition.

    So when gearheads claim that the steroids are just enabling them to work harder, they are if not lying, then just wrong. Sadly, they are wrong about that. In the lower dose ranges, it may actually have an effect where it reinforces training adaptations, but the hypertrophy seen with higher doses is purely driven by chemistry.

    A lot of people have been flaming this post complaining that the subjects were untrained. Well for comparison, the vast majority of natural lifters, even lifelong ones, will never increase their lean body mass by more than kgs. But for all I know, for the big guy, doing roids could have been the easy way out and for some, it certainly has been. Of course, after a steroid cycle, most of the muscle gained will be lost, but the period of having chemically hypertrophic muscle most likely provides a degree of size consolidation i.

    But this is all a consequence of the hypocrisy in the bodybuilding community regarding steroids. A hypocrisy that most probably comes all the way from the top.

    Stop the steroid taboo! The effects of supraphysiologic doses of testosterone on muscle size and strength in normal men. The New England Journal of Medicine, 1 , 1—7. Testosterone dose-response relationships in healthy young men. Jama, 9 , — The motivation behind the blog post was that so many gear heads claim that they came by their results by themselves, when the truth is that they would be much smaller and weaker with the same effort in eating and training, but without the gear.

    Just look at how much IFBB pros shrink when they go off gear. I don't give a shit if people use gear or not, but when they do, they should acknowledge how much it actually changes the game. Thank you for your comment. I'm working on having some of my danish language post translated to english.

    In the Danish clinical recommendations it is mg every weeks and i think this goes for most of europe. The recommendations of the Endocrine society is 75— mg of testosterone enanthate or cypionate administered im weekly, or — mg administered every 2 wk, according to their web page http: I'm pretty sure that your doctor is talking out of his arse.

    Your post makes every steroid user look to be ignorant or uneducated. Genetics play a major part in muscle growth which is neglected in this study and all studies. This post and the information is already common knowledge and to be honest pointless. I suspect butthurt may be at play.

    Actually, I didn't mean to bash steroid users as such, just the ignorant ones. I don't give a flying fuck what people are using or not using and actually think that steroids should be decriminalized.

    However, just as much as i think the anti-doping authorities are demonizing steroids on a very weak scientific foundation, a lot of users are actively downplaying both the effects and risks associated with using them.

    This polarized debate serves no one and if we are to ever have a meaningful public debate about this both sides have to change their communication about this.

    Lol,genetics has nothing to do with bodybuilding. If they were genetically gifted, hormonallly blessed muscle monsters they would play a real sport instead of strutting around on a stage in the male equivalent of miss universe.

    Most bodybuilders are actually the opposite of genetically gifted. From experience I can tell you it's the drugs. Genetic gifts come in all flavors. The ability to grow big muscles, to respond well and tolerate gear is also a genetic gift of sorts. He is right,i have gained muscle sitting on my arse just using sus per week,but genetics play a huge role in determining who is going to gain the most muscle genetically,i knew a guy that ran enough anabolics to drop a buffalo but he still couldnt develop the physique required to stand on the Olympia stage.

    Even though he gained a huge amount of muscle he just had this narrow frame that just wouldnt even allow him to place in at a national competition. And if you compare the results of the natty lifting group to the steroid lifting group, the steroid lifting group gained 14lbs vs 3. Lots and lots of people take steroids without looking the part.

    Hence genetics, as always, play a major role here. Quite often the story goes like this. Juicer begins to juice, first cycle ever. Fat melts, muscles explode, constant wood, feeling on top of the world and all the rest of it. People always play with a genetic card when discussing such matter. Drugs will take you to another level, which it boosts up your performance and sculpts every muscles of your body that makes people say wow.

    People who are very jacked do not only inject one type of steroid, they will put in other drugs to increase vascularity and muscle mass while at the same time maintaining low body fat.

    I used to train very hard, naturally. My life changed abruptly. After stepping away from training, I studied about AAS and juiced. I gained 50lbs in 8 weeks, the Dr pulled my prescription. This was years ago. Recently I decided to cycle. I trained natural for a long time, and took the best supplements around the clock.

    My weight and size is exactly as it was years ago naturally lifting but heavy. Though I exceeded these lifts I feel the time in life is critical for analysis, at 25yoa my test was at its natural height for lifting. I feel that results can be maintained if one surpasses weeks of cycling absent a solid exercise routine.

    I achieved a 2 stone gain, first month, with a Winny only cycle, some T-bol. I do some flexing for tone, but very little. I weigh about lbs clothed and lean. I guess to say that all that training for perfection, all those years, mostly diet mediated mind you, I now, in later years 47yoa, can rely on my hard training and anabolics to maintain a decent physique.

    Nothing like it was, but it looks solid and substantial. Great study post BTW! Point being after 4 mos of steady cycling and zero, 0 training these are my stats. Nothing but occasional flexing. I began at a sloppy lbs 3. Point being after nearly 4 mos of steady cycling and zero, 0 training these are my stats.

    You are welcome to mod my comments and edit and condense. Per; speed, agility and quickness pub. Genetic plays a huge role in bodybuilding and popowerlifting. Also you forgot to mention that if you work hard and take steroids versus a person not working out at all and taking steroids or just working out a little bit and taking steroids obviously the most benefit you get from the person who working out very hard and taking steroids.

    However if you maintain your hard-working ethics and eat right and do your PCT you will keep a lot of your gains. As much as i appreciate your answer, I have to say that you are wrong.

    steroid cycle no results

    steroid cycle no results

    steroid cycle no results